跳转到主要内容

这是本节的多页打印视图。 .

返回本页常规视图.

Timeout 等待

有意休眠、重试间隔、节流与限速延迟。

Timeout 通常表示 PostgreSQL 有意延迟工作,直到计时器到期。关键问题不是“内核为什么慢”,而是“哪条策略或安全机制插入了这段延迟”。

找到策略责任方

Vacuum 成本延迟、恢复延迟、备份节流、检查点摊平、重试间隔与 pg_sleep() 都是设计好的等待。当策略不再匹配服务目标,或另一瓶颈让延迟过度重复时,它们才成为问题。

  • 正常: 配置策略正在生效,而且有效工作按预期速率推进。
  • 关注: 前台延迟包含有意休眠,或维护任务大量时间都在节流而逐渐落后。
  • 紧急: 恢复/备份/检查点错过时限、spin delay 持续,或运维人员并未打算启用这条策略。

值得先认出的事件

事件 策略
VacuumDelay 基于成本的 vacuum 节流
CheckpointWriteDelay 把检查点写入摊平到整个间隔
RecoveryApplyDelay 有意延迟备库回放
RecoveryRetrieveRetryInterval 对不可用 WAL 源进行重试
BaseBackupThrottle 备份传输限速
PgSleep SQL 或内部 sleep 函数
SpinDelay 获取竞争 spinlock 时退避

常见误读

  • Timeout 不表示 statement timeout 或 lock timeout 已经触发;它表示进程此刻在计时器上休眠。
  • 减少 vacuum delay 能恢复维护吞吐,但也可能增加 I/O 与 CPU 压力。
  • RecoveryApplyDelay 可能是有意的灾备策略。
  • 持续的 SpinDelay 应当升级处理:spinlock 正常只会被持有极短时间。

1 - Timeout: BaseBackupThrottle

基础备份期间,因限速而等待。
PostgreSQL 等待事件档案
类别Timeout 事件BaseBackupThrottle 版本PG 13-18 证据2 个源码位置

官方描述译文

基础备份期间,因限速而等待。

PG 13 PG 14 PG 15 PG 16 PG 17 PG 18

触发机制

WAIT_EVENT_BASE_BACKUP_THROTTLE 位于 src/backend/backup/basebackup_throttle.c:178,是经 grep 核验的报告路径。公共身份/资源映射位于 src/backend/utils/activity/wait_event_names.txt:175。探针覆盖的操作是:基础备份期间,因限速而等待。BaseBackupThrottle 路径有意等待计时器、重试间隔、节流或安全退避;latch 超时后才重新评估工作。

正常还是麻烦?

  • 正常: 当配置策略是有意的,而且有效工作按预期速率推进时,这项等待正常。
  • 需要调查: 策略导致维护、恢复、备份或延迟目标无法达成,或者 spin delay 持续时,应当调查。

诊断 SQL

正在等待 Timeout/BaseBackupThrottle 的会话
SELECT pid, backend_type, usename, datname, application_name,
       state, now() - query_start AS query_age,
       now() - xact_start AS xact_age,
       wait_event_type, wait_event,
       pg_blocking_pids(pid) AS blocking_pids,
       left(query, 160) AS query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
  AND wait_event = 'BaseBackupThrottle'
ORDER BY query_age DESC NULLS LAST;
当前 Timeout 等待分布
SELECT wait_event, count(*) AS waiting_sessions,
       count(*) FILTER (WHERE state = 'active') AS active_waiters,
       max(now() - query_start) AS oldest_query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
GROUP BY wait_event
ORDER BY waiting_sessions DESC, wait_event;
这些会话的锁与关系上下文
SELECT a.pid, l.locktype, l.mode, l.granted, l.fastpath,
       d.datname, n.nspname, c.relname,
       l.page, l.tuple, l.virtualxid, l.transactionid,
       l.classid, l.objid, l.objsubid
FROM pg_stat_activity AS a
LEFT JOIN pg_locks AS l ON l.pid = a.pid
LEFT JOIN pg_database AS d ON d.oid = l.database
LEFT JOIN pg_class AS c
  ON c.oid = l.relation
 AND l.database = (
       SELECT oid FROM pg_database WHERE datname = current_database()
     )
LEFT JOIN pg_namespace AS n ON n.oid = c.relnamespace
WHERE a.wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
  AND a.wait_event = 'BaseBackupThrottle'
ORDER BY a.pid, l.granted, l.locktype, l.mode;

处置建议

  1. 确认拥有该计时器的 GUC 或函数。
  2. 比较有效工作量与延迟时间。
  3. 先检查它原本要控制的 CPU、I/O 与持久性压力,再调整策略。

源码证据

2 - Timeout: CheckpointWriteDelay

执行检查点时,在两次写入之间等待。
PostgreSQL 等待事件档案
类别Timeout 事件CheckpointWriteDelay 版本PG 14-18 证据2 个源码位置

官方描述译文

执行检查点时,在两次写入之间等待。

PG 13 PG 14 PG 15 PG 16 PG 17 PG 18

触发机制

WAIT_EVENT_CHECKPOINT_WRITE_DELAY 位于 src/backend/postmaster/checkpointer.c:814,是经 grep 核验的报告路径。公共身份/资源映射位于 src/backend/utils/activity/wait_event_names.txt:176。探针覆盖的操作是:执行检查点时,在两次写入之间等待。CheckpointWriteDelay 路径有意等待计时器、重试间隔、节流或安全退避;latch 超时后才重新评估工作。

正常还是麻烦?

  • 正常: 当配置策略是有意的,而且有效工作按预期速率推进时,这项等待正常。
  • 需要调查: 策略导致维护、恢复、备份或延迟目标无法达成,或者 spin delay 持续时,应当调查。

诊断 SQL

正在等待 Timeout/CheckpointWriteDelay 的会话
SELECT pid, backend_type, usename, datname, application_name,
       state, now() - query_start AS query_age,
       now() - xact_start AS xact_age,
       wait_event_type, wait_event,
       pg_blocking_pids(pid) AS blocking_pids,
       left(query, 160) AS query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
  AND wait_event = 'CheckpointWriteDelay'
ORDER BY query_age DESC NULLS LAST;
当前 Timeout 等待分布
SELECT wait_event, count(*) AS waiting_sessions,
       count(*) FILTER (WHERE state = 'active') AS active_waiters,
       max(now() - query_start) AS oldest_query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
GROUP BY wait_event
ORDER BY waiting_sessions DESC, wait_event;
这些会话的锁与关系上下文
SELECT a.pid, l.locktype, l.mode, l.granted, l.fastpath,
       d.datname, n.nspname, c.relname,
       l.page, l.tuple, l.virtualxid, l.transactionid,
       l.classid, l.objid, l.objsubid
FROM pg_stat_activity AS a
LEFT JOIN pg_locks AS l ON l.pid = a.pid
LEFT JOIN pg_database AS d ON d.oid = l.database
LEFT JOIN pg_class AS c
  ON c.oid = l.relation
 AND l.database = (
       SELECT oid FROM pg_database WHERE datname = current_database()
     )
LEFT JOIN pg_namespace AS n ON n.oid = c.relnamespace
WHERE a.wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
  AND a.wait_event = 'CheckpointWriteDelay'
ORDER BY a.pid, l.granted, l.locktype, l.mode;

处置建议

  1. 确认拥有该计时器的 GUC 或函数。
  2. 比较有效工作量与延迟时间。
  3. 先检查它原本要控制的 CPU、I/O 与持久性压力,再调整策略。

源码证据

3 - Timeout: PgSleep

因调用 pg_sleep 或同类函数而等待。
PostgreSQL 等待事件档案
类别Timeout 事件PgSleep 版本PG 13-18 证据2 个源码位置

官方描述译文

因调用 pg_sleep 或同类函数而等待。

PG 13 PG 14 PG 15 PG 16 PG 17 PG 18

触发机制

WAIT_EVENT_PG_SLEEP 位于 src/backend/utils/adt/misc.c:409,是经 grep 核验的报告路径。公共身份/资源映射位于 src/backend/utils/activity/wait_event_names.txt:177。探针覆盖的操作是:因调用 pg_sleep 或同类函数而等待。PgSleep 路径有意等待计时器、重试间隔、节流或安全退避;latch 超时后才重新评估工作。

正常还是麻烦?

  • 正常: 当配置策略是有意的,而且有效工作按预期速率推进时,这项等待正常。
  • 需要调查: 策略导致维护、恢复、备份或延迟目标无法达成,或者 spin delay 持续时,应当调查。

诊断 SQL

正在等待 Timeout/PgSleep 的会话
SELECT pid, backend_type, usename, datname, application_name,
       state, now() - query_start AS query_age,
       now() - xact_start AS xact_age,
       wait_event_type, wait_event,
       pg_blocking_pids(pid) AS blocking_pids,
       left(query, 160) AS query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
  AND wait_event = 'PgSleep'
ORDER BY query_age DESC NULLS LAST;
当前 Timeout 等待分布
SELECT wait_event, count(*) AS waiting_sessions,
       count(*) FILTER (WHERE state = 'active') AS active_waiters,
       max(now() - query_start) AS oldest_query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
GROUP BY wait_event
ORDER BY waiting_sessions DESC, wait_event;
这些会话的锁与关系上下文
SELECT a.pid, l.locktype, l.mode, l.granted, l.fastpath,
       d.datname, n.nspname, c.relname,
       l.page, l.tuple, l.virtualxid, l.transactionid,
       l.classid, l.objid, l.objsubid
FROM pg_stat_activity AS a
LEFT JOIN pg_locks AS l ON l.pid = a.pid
LEFT JOIN pg_database AS d ON d.oid = l.database
LEFT JOIN pg_class AS c
  ON c.oid = l.relation
 AND l.database = (
       SELECT oid FROM pg_database WHERE datname = current_database()
     )
LEFT JOIN pg_namespace AS n ON n.oid = c.relnamespace
WHERE a.wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
  AND a.wait_event = 'PgSleep'
ORDER BY a.pid, l.granted, l.locktype, l.mode;

处置建议

  1. 确认拥有该计时器的 GUC 或函数。
  2. 比较有效工作量与延迟时间。
  3. 先检查它原本要控制的 CPU、I/O 与持久性压力,再调整策略。

源码证据

4 - Timeout: RecoveryApplyDelay

恢复期间,因延迟设置而等待应用 WAL。
PostgreSQL 等待事件档案
类别Timeout 事件RecoveryApplyDelay 版本PG 13-18 证据2 个源码位置

官方描述译文

恢复期间,因延迟设置而等待应用 WAL。

PG 13 PG 14 PG 15 PG 16 PG 17 PG 18

触发机制

WAIT_EVENT_RECOVERY_APPLY_DELAY 位于 src/backend/access/transam/xlogrecovery.c:3092,是经 grep 核验的报告路径。公共身份/资源映射位于 src/backend/utils/activity/wait_event_names.txt:178。探针覆盖的操作是:恢复期间,因延迟设置而等待应用 WAL。RecoveryApplyDelay 路径有意等待计时器、重试间隔、节流或安全退避;latch 超时后才重新评估工作。

正常还是麻烦?

  • 正常: 当配置策略是有意的,而且有效工作按预期速率推进时,这项等待正常。
  • 需要调查: 策略导致维护、恢复、备份或延迟目标无法达成,或者 spin delay 持续时,应当调查。

诊断 SQL

正在等待 Timeout/RecoveryApplyDelay 的会话
SELECT pid, backend_type, usename, datname, application_name,
       state, now() - query_start AS query_age,
       now() - xact_start AS xact_age,
       wait_event_type, wait_event,
       pg_blocking_pids(pid) AS blocking_pids,
       left(query, 160) AS query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
  AND wait_event = 'RecoveryApplyDelay'
ORDER BY query_age DESC NULLS LAST;
当前 Timeout 等待分布
SELECT wait_event, count(*) AS waiting_sessions,
       count(*) FILTER (WHERE state = 'active') AS active_waiters,
       max(now() - query_start) AS oldest_query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
GROUP BY wait_event
ORDER BY waiting_sessions DESC, wait_event;
这些会话的锁与关系上下文
SELECT a.pid, l.locktype, l.mode, l.granted, l.fastpath,
       d.datname, n.nspname, c.relname,
       l.page, l.tuple, l.virtualxid, l.transactionid,
       l.classid, l.objid, l.objsubid
FROM pg_stat_activity AS a
LEFT JOIN pg_locks AS l ON l.pid = a.pid
LEFT JOIN pg_database AS d ON d.oid = l.database
LEFT JOIN pg_class AS c
  ON c.oid = l.relation
 AND l.database = (
       SELECT oid FROM pg_database WHERE datname = current_database()
     )
LEFT JOIN pg_namespace AS n ON n.oid = c.relnamespace
WHERE a.wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
  AND a.wait_event = 'RecoveryApplyDelay'
ORDER BY a.pid, l.granted, l.locktype, l.mode;

处置建议

  1. 确认拥有该计时器的 GUC 或函数。
  2. 比较有效工作量与延迟时间。
  3. 先检查它原本要控制的 CPU、I/O 与持久性压力,再调整策略。

源码证据

5 - Timeout: RecoveryRetrieveRetryInterval

恢复期间,当所有来源(pg_wal、归档或流式传输)均无 WAL 数据可用时等待。
PostgreSQL 等待事件档案
类别Timeout 事件RecoveryRetrieveRetryInterval 版本PG 13-18 证据2 个源码位置

官方描述译文

恢复期间,当所有来源(pg_wal、归档或流式传输)均无 WAL 数据可用时等待。

PG 13 PG 14 PG 15 PG 16 PG 17 PG 18

触发机制

WAIT_EVENT_RECOVERY_RETRIEVE_RETRY_INTERVAL 位于 src/backend/access/transam/xlogrecovery.c:3764,是经 grep 核验的报告路径。公共身份/资源映射位于 src/backend/utils/activity/wait_event_names.txt:179。探针覆盖的操作是:恢复期间,当所有来源(pg_wal、归档或流式传输)均无 WAL 数据可用时等待。RecoveryRetrieveRetryInterval 路径有意等待计时器、重试间隔、节流或安全退避;latch 超时后才重新评估工作。

正常还是麻烦?

  • 正常: 当配置策略是有意的,而且有效工作按预期速率推进时,这项等待正常。
  • 需要调查: 策略导致维护、恢复、备份或延迟目标无法达成,或者 spin delay 持续时,应当调查。

诊断 SQL

正在等待 Timeout/RecoveryRetrieveRetryInterval 的会话
SELECT pid, backend_type, usename, datname, application_name,
       state, now() - query_start AS query_age,
       now() - xact_start AS xact_age,
       wait_event_type, wait_event,
       pg_blocking_pids(pid) AS blocking_pids,
       left(query, 160) AS query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
  AND wait_event = 'RecoveryRetrieveRetryInterval'
ORDER BY query_age DESC NULLS LAST;
当前 Timeout 等待分布
SELECT wait_event, count(*) AS waiting_sessions,
       count(*) FILTER (WHERE state = 'active') AS active_waiters,
       max(now() - query_start) AS oldest_query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
GROUP BY wait_event
ORDER BY waiting_sessions DESC, wait_event;
这些会话的锁与关系上下文
SELECT a.pid, l.locktype, l.mode, l.granted, l.fastpath,
       d.datname, n.nspname, c.relname,
       l.page, l.tuple, l.virtualxid, l.transactionid,
       l.classid, l.objid, l.objsubid
FROM pg_stat_activity AS a
LEFT JOIN pg_locks AS l ON l.pid = a.pid
LEFT JOIN pg_database AS d ON d.oid = l.database
LEFT JOIN pg_class AS c
  ON c.oid = l.relation
 AND l.database = (
       SELECT oid FROM pg_database WHERE datname = current_database()
     )
LEFT JOIN pg_namespace AS n ON n.oid = c.relnamespace
WHERE a.wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
  AND a.wait_event = 'RecoveryRetrieveRetryInterval'
ORDER BY a.pid, l.granted, l.locktype, l.mode;

处置建议

  1. 确认拥有该计时器的 GUC 或函数。
  2. 比较有效工作量与延迟时间。
  3. 先检查它原本要控制的 CPU、I/O 与持久性压力,再调整策略。

源码证据

6 - Timeout: RegisterSyncRequest

由于请求队列已满,在向 checkpointer 发送同步请求时等待。
PostgreSQL 等待事件档案
类别Timeout 事件RegisterSyncRequest 版本PG 13-18 证据2 个源码位置

官方描述译文

由于请求队列已满,在向 checkpointer 发送同步请求时等待。

PG 13 PG 14 PG 15 PG 16 PG 17 PG 18

触发机制

WAIT_EVENT_REGISTER_SYNC_REQUEST 位于 src/backend/storage/sync/sync.c:615,是经 grep 核验的报告路径。公共身份/资源映射位于 src/backend/utils/activity/wait_event_names.txt:180。探针覆盖的操作是:由于请求队列已满,在向 checkpointer 发送同步请求时等待。RegisterSyncRequest 路径有意等待计时器、重试间隔、节流或安全退避;latch 超时后才重新评估工作。

正常还是麻烦?

  • 正常: 当配置策略是有意的,而且有效工作按预期速率推进时,这项等待正常。
  • 需要调查: 策略导致维护、恢复、备份或延迟目标无法达成,或者 spin delay 持续时,应当调查。

诊断 SQL

正在等待 Timeout/RegisterSyncRequest 的会话
SELECT pid, backend_type, usename, datname, application_name,
       state, now() - query_start AS query_age,
       now() - xact_start AS xact_age,
       wait_event_type, wait_event,
       pg_blocking_pids(pid) AS blocking_pids,
       left(query, 160) AS query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
  AND wait_event = 'RegisterSyncRequest'
ORDER BY query_age DESC NULLS LAST;
当前 Timeout 等待分布
SELECT wait_event, count(*) AS waiting_sessions,
       count(*) FILTER (WHERE state = 'active') AS active_waiters,
       max(now() - query_start) AS oldest_query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
GROUP BY wait_event
ORDER BY waiting_sessions DESC, wait_event;
这些会话的锁与关系上下文
SELECT a.pid, l.locktype, l.mode, l.granted, l.fastpath,
       d.datname, n.nspname, c.relname,
       l.page, l.tuple, l.virtualxid, l.transactionid,
       l.classid, l.objid, l.objsubid
FROM pg_stat_activity AS a
LEFT JOIN pg_locks AS l ON l.pid = a.pid
LEFT JOIN pg_database AS d ON d.oid = l.database
LEFT JOIN pg_class AS c
  ON c.oid = l.relation
 AND l.database = (
       SELECT oid FROM pg_database WHERE datname = current_database()
     )
LEFT JOIN pg_namespace AS n ON n.oid = c.relnamespace
WHERE a.wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
  AND a.wait_event = 'RegisterSyncRequest'
ORDER BY a.pid, l.granted, l.locktype, l.mode;

处置建议

  1. 确认拥有该计时器的 GUC 或函数。
  2. 比较有效工作量与延迟时间。
  3. 先检查它原本要控制的 CPU、I/O 与持久性压力,再调整策略。

源码证据

7 - Timeout: SpinDelay

获取发生争用的 spinlock 时等待。
PostgreSQL 等待事件档案
类别Timeout 事件SpinDelay 版本PG 16-18 证据2 个源码位置

官方描述译文

获取发生争用的 spinlock 时等待。

PG 13 PG 14 PG 15 PG 16 PG 17 PG 18

触发机制

WAIT_EVENT_SPIN_DELAY 位于 src/backend/storage/lmgr/s_lock.c:148,是经 grep 核验的报告路径。公共身份/资源映射位于 src/backend/utils/activity/wait_event_names.txt:181。探针覆盖的操作是:获取发生争用的 spinlock 时等待。SpinDelay 路径有意等待计时器、重试间隔、节流或安全退避;latch 超时后才重新评估工作。

正常还是麻烦?

  • 正常: 当配置策略是有意的,而且有效工作按预期速率推进时,这项等待正常。
  • 需要调查: 策略导致维护、恢复、备份或延迟目标无法达成,或者 spin delay 持续时,应当调查。

诊断 SQL

正在等待 Timeout/SpinDelay 的会话
SELECT pid, backend_type, usename, datname, application_name,
       state, now() - query_start AS query_age,
       now() - xact_start AS xact_age,
       wait_event_type, wait_event,
       pg_blocking_pids(pid) AS blocking_pids,
       left(query, 160) AS query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
  AND wait_event = 'SpinDelay'
ORDER BY query_age DESC NULLS LAST;
当前 Timeout 等待分布
SELECT wait_event, count(*) AS waiting_sessions,
       count(*) FILTER (WHERE state = 'active') AS active_waiters,
       max(now() - query_start) AS oldest_query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
GROUP BY wait_event
ORDER BY waiting_sessions DESC, wait_event;
这些会话的锁与关系上下文
SELECT a.pid, l.locktype, l.mode, l.granted, l.fastpath,
       d.datname, n.nspname, c.relname,
       l.page, l.tuple, l.virtualxid, l.transactionid,
       l.classid, l.objid, l.objsubid
FROM pg_stat_activity AS a
LEFT JOIN pg_locks AS l ON l.pid = a.pid
LEFT JOIN pg_database AS d ON d.oid = l.database
LEFT JOIN pg_class AS c
  ON c.oid = l.relation
 AND l.database = (
       SELECT oid FROM pg_database WHERE datname = current_database()
     )
LEFT JOIN pg_namespace AS n ON n.oid = c.relnamespace
WHERE a.wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
  AND a.wait_event = 'SpinDelay'
ORDER BY a.pid, l.granted, l.locktype, l.mode;

处置建议

  1. 确认拥有该计时器的 GUC 或函数。
  2. 比较有效工作量与延迟时间。
  3. 先检查它原本要控制的 CPU、I/O 与持久性压力,再调整策略。

源码证据

8 - Timeout: VacuumDelay

在基于成本的 vacuum 延迟点等待。
PostgreSQL 等待事件档案
类别Timeout 事件VacuumDelay 版本PG 13-18 证据2 个源码位置

官方描述译文

在基于成本的 vacuum 延迟点等待。

PG 13 PG 14 PG 15 PG 16 PG 17 PG 18

触发机制

WAIT_EVENT_VACUUM_DELAY 位于 src/backend/commands/vacuum.c:2495,是经 grep 核验的报告路径。公共身份/资源映射位于 src/backend/utils/activity/wait_event_names.txt:182。探针覆盖的操作是:在基于成本的 vacuum 延迟点等待。VacuumDelay 路径有意等待计时器、重试间隔、节流或安全退避;latch 超时后才重新评估工作。

正常还是麻烦?

  • 正常: 当配置策略是有意的,而且有效工作按预期速率推进时,这项等待正常。
  • 需要调查: 策略导致维护、恢复、备份或延迟目标无法达成,或者 spin delay 持续时,应当调查。

诊断 SQL

正在等待 Timeout/VacuumDelay 的会话
SELECT pid, backend_type, usename, datname, application_name,
       state, now() - query_start AS query_age,
       now() - xact_start AS xact_age,
       wait_event_type, wait_event,
       pg_blocking_pids(pid) AS blocking_pids,
       left(query, 160) AS query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
  AND wait_event = 'VacuumDelay'
ORDER BY query_age DESC NULLS LAST;
当前 Timeout 等待分布
SELECT wait_event, count(*) AS waiting_sessions,
       count(*) FILTER (WHERE state = 'active') AS active_waiters,
       max(now() - query_start) AS oldest_query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
GROUP BY wait_event
ORDER BY waiting_sessions DESC, wait_event;
这些会话的锁与关系上下文
SELECT a.pid, l.locktype, l.mode, l.granted, l.fastpath,
       d.datname, n.nspname, c.relname,
       l.page, l.tuple, l.virtualxid, l.transactionid,
       l.classid, l.objid, l.objsubid
FROM pg_stat_activity AS a
LEFT JOIN pg_locks AS l ON l.pid = a.pid
LEFT JOIN pg_database AS d ON d.oid = l.database
LEFT JOIN pg_class AS c
  ON c.oid = l.relation
 AND l.database = (
       SELECT oid FROM pg_database WHERE datname = current_database()
     )
LEFT JOIN pg_namespace AS n ON n.oid = c.relnamespace
WHERE a.wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
  AND a.wait_event = 'VacuumDelay'
ORDER BY a.pid, l.granted, l.locktype, l.mode;

处置建议

  1. 确认拥有该计时器的 GUC 或函数。
  2. 比较有效工作量与延迟时间。
  3. 先检查它原本要控制的 CPU、I/O 与持久性压力,再调整策略。

源码证据

9 - Timeout: VacuumTruncate

等待获取独占锁,以截去正在执行 vacuum 的表末尾所有空页。
PostgreSQL 等待事件档案
类别Timeout 事件VacuumTruncate 版本PG 15-18 证据2 个源码位置

官方描述译文

等待获取独占锁,以截去正在执行 vacuum 的表末尾所有空页。

PG 13 PG 14 PG 15 PG 16 PG 17 PG 18

触发机制

WAIT_EVENT_VACUUM_TRUNCATE 位于 src/backend/access/heap/vacuumlazy.c:3280,是经 grep 核验的报告路径。公共身份/资源映射位于 src/backend/utils/activity/wait_event_names.txt:183。探针覆盖的操作是:等待获取独占锁,以截去正在执行 vacuum 的表末尾所有空页。VacuumTruncate 路径有意等待计时器、重试间隔、节流或安全退避;latch 超时后才重新评估工作。

正常还是麻烦?

  • 正常: 当配置策略是有意的,而且有效工作按预期速率推进时,这项等待正常。
  • 需要调查: 策略导致维护、恢复、备份或延迟目标无法达成,或者 spin delay 持续时,应当调查。

诊断 SQL

正在等待 Timeout/VacuumTruncate 的会话
SELECT pid, backend_type, usename, datname, application_name,
       state, now() - query_start AS query_age,
       now() - xact_start AS xact_age,
       wait_event_type, wait_event,
       pg_blocking_pids(pid) AS blocking_pids,
       left(query, 160) AS query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
  AND wait_event = 'VacuumTruncate'
ORDER BY query_age DESC NULLS LAST;
当前 Timeout 等待分布
SELECT wait_event, count(*) AS waiting_sessions,
       count(*) FILTER (WHERE state = 'active') AS active_waiters,
       max(now() - query_start) AS oldest_query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
GROUP BY wait_event
ORDER BY waiting_sessions DESC, wait_event;
这些会话的锁与关系上下文
SELECT a.pid, l.locktype, l.mode, l.granted, l.fastpath,
       d.datname, n.nspname, c.relname,
       l.page, l.tuple, l.virtualxid, l.transactionid,
       l.classid, l.objid, l.objsubid
FROM pg_stat_activity AS a
LEFT JOIN pg_locks AS l ON l.pid = a.pid
LEFT JOIN pg_database AS d ON d.oid = l.database
LEFT JOIN pg_class AS c
  ON c.oid = l.relation
 AND l.database = (
       SELECT oid FROM pg_database WHERE datname = current_database()
     )
LEFT JOIN pg_namespace AS n ON n.oid = c.relnamespace
WHERE a.wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
  AND a.wait_event = 'VacuumTruncate'
ORDER BY a.pid, l.granted, l.locktype, l.mode;

处置建议

  1. 确认拥有该计时器的 GUC 或函数。
  2. 比较有效工作量与延迟时间。
  3. 先检查它原本要控制的 CPU、I/O 与持久性压力,再调整策略。

源码证据

10 - Timeout: WalSummarizerError

WAL summarizer 出错后等待。
PostgreSQL 等待事件档案
类别Timeout 事件WalSummarizerError 版本PG 17-18 证据2 个源码位置

官方描述译文

WAL summarizer 出错后等待。

PG 13 PG 14 PG 15 PG 16 PG 17 PG 18

触发机制

WAIT_EVENT_WAL_SUMMARIZER_ERROR 位于 src/backend/postmaster/walsummarizer.c:337,是经 grep 核验的报告路径。公共身份/资源映射位于 src/backend/utils/activity/wait_event_names.txt:184。探针覆盖的操作是:WAL summarizer 出错后等待。WalSummarizerError 路径有意等待计时器、重试间隔、节流或安全退避;latch 超时后才重新评估工作。

正常还是麻烦?

  • 正常: 当配置策略是有意的,而且有效工作按预期速率推进时,这项等待正常。
  • 需要调查: 策略导致维护、恢复、备份或延迟目标无法达成,或者 spin delay 持续时,应当调查。

诊断 SQL

正在等待 Timeout/WalSummarizerError 的会话
SELECT pid, backend_type, usename, datname, application_name,
       state, now() - query_start AS query_age,
       now() - xact_start AS xact_age,
       wait_event_type, wait_event,
       pg_blocking_pids(pid) AS blocking_pids,
       left(query, 160) AS query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
  AND wait_event = 'WalSummarizerError'
ORDER BY query_age DESC NULLS LAST;
当前 Timeout 等待分布
SELECT wait_event, count(*) AS waiting_sessions,
       count(*) FILTER (WHERE state = 'active') AS active_waiters,
       max(now() - query_start) AS oldest_query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
GROUP BY wait_event
ORDER BY waiting_sessions DESC, wait_event;
这些会话的锁与关系上下文
SELECT a.pid, l.locktype, l.mode, l.granted, l.fastpath,
       d.datname, n.nspname, c.relname,
       l.page, l.tuple, l.virtualxid, l.transactionid,
       l.classid, l.objid, l.objsubid
FROM pg_stat_activity AS a
LEFT JOIN pg_locks AS l ON l.pid = a.pid
LEFT JOIN pg_database AS d ON d.oid = l.database
LEFT JOIN pg_class AS c
  ON c.oid = l.relation
 AND l.database = (
       SELECT oid FROM pg_database WHERE datname = current_database()
     )
LEFT JOIN pg_namespace AS n ON n.oid = c.relnamespace
WHERE a.wait_event_type = 'Timeout'
  AND a.wait_event = 'WalSummarizerError'
ORDER BY a.pid, l.granted, l.locktype, l.mode;

处置建议

  1. 确认拥有该计时器的 GUC 或函数。
  2. 比较有效工作量与延迟时间。
  3. 先检查它原本要控制的 CPU、I/O 与持久性压力,再调整策略。

源码证据